Ternullo for Stoneham / Winchester - An Unofficial Archive of Stephen Ternullo's Public Record

Facebook thread: a post in the Stoneham Community Group (Jan 22, 2023) by a redacted user (User A) alleging that Stephen Ternullo Sr., a Stoneham Select Board candidate, blocked her and refused to answer her questions, followed by screenshots proving it — a thread where he mostly replies "you're welcome" and a photo instead of answering her question. Attached: a re-shared copy of Ternullo's own campaign post from 5 hours earlier ("Great day today speaking with the Stoneham taxpayers...I will be your voice."), showing him in front of an American flag next to a campaign sign reading "US ARMY VETERAN TERNULLO STEPHEN Select Board 'I will be your Voice!'", plus three smaller thumbnails: two of the same yard sign photographed roadside in snow, and a repeat of the flag/sign photo captioned "Stephen Ternullo for Stoneham Select Board Supports... Father of Two Beautiful Children... A Strong Police Department." Below is a phone screenshot of "Replies to your comment on Stephen Ternullo Sr.'s post," transcribed in order: User A: "[Stephen Ternullo Sr.] I like to stay informed as a voter & googled you. That gave me your address on Cottage St. I was familiar with your house, as I'm on Cottage multiple times a day & I recognized it as the home with pro Trump/anti Biden signs. To learn more about your political beliefs & philosophies, my question to you is, could you compare & contrast yourself & how you would lead Stoneham to our former select board member Caroline Colorusso who holds similar strong pro Trump/anti Biden sentiments? Thank you" User B (a different redacted commenter): "great question." Stephen Ternullo Sr.: "[User A] you're welcome" Stephen Ternullo Sr. posts a photo with no caption: a man in US Army camouflage uniform standing in front of an American flag. User A: "[Stephen Ternullo Sr.] Maybe you're confused. I was asking you, someone who is running for elected office, a question that would provide information on how you would lead this town & how you compare yourself to a prior town select board member who appears to hold similar political leaning as you do. I wasn't asking for a photo. I read what you posted as your resume. Do you have an issue with answering questions to potential constituents? Personally, the social media blocking done by CC was a big issue for me." Stephen Ternullo Sr.: "[User A] just say thank you" User A: "So no answer? You're just looking for accolades? Got it. Thanks." Stephen Ternullo Sr.: "[User A] you're welcome" User A: "FYI, earlier I received several messages thanking me for my questions to you. Apparently many in town had the same type of questions. It really was a great opportunity for you to clearly express how you would lead this town without conspiracies & lies as CC had. MANY of us do not want a repeat of her. Your reply spoke volumes to our liberal leaning town. You had a big chance to really win people over. Please don't delete; we like transparency! But no worries if you do. I've taken screenshots to share closer to the election. Thanks again hun!" User A: "[Stephen Ternullo Sr.] Now I know who I'm not voting for. I greatly appreciate your clarification. I'll be sure to share your responses with other voters in town." Stephen Ternullo Sr.: "My fellow comrades this is what Cillian think of us. They just won't say thank you"

Facebook comment thread, from about four years before the screenshot, in which a redacted commenter (User A) recounts replying to a now-deleted post that Stephen Ternullo's "bizarre responses" to another user (User B, also redacted, referenced only in passing) convinced her never to vote for him — and that he retaliated by bringing up her vaccination status. A second redacted commenter (User C) replies backing her up. Transcript — User A: "I replied to a post late last night that seems to have been deleted. Basically I said that after seeing Mr. Ternullo's bizarre responses to [User B] there was no way I would ever vote for him. He replied immediately mentioning my vaccination status. I think he said I should enjoy my vax or something like that. Is the man also a conspiracy theorist who has fallen for the recent baloney that vaxxed people are dying at abnormally high rates? Again, not someone I would ever vote for." User C: "[User A] He refuses to answer legitimate questions but then has the arrogance to comment on your Vax status? Did you ask for his first? Your Vax status is simply and exactly 💯 none of his f***ing business... Next time tie comment on his dick size... (Not really, I'm just making a point as it's just another one of those none of your business things)"

Single Facebook comment by Stephen G Ternullo (marked "Author"), about longtime versus newer Stoneham residents. Text: "[User A, redacted] I have been a resident of Stoneham since 1992 and it was a conservative town. Many of the Stoneham residents that opposed me last election have been in town less then 10 years." No other commenters appear in the image.

Facebook comment thread (about 1 year before the screenshot) between Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor") and a redacted commenter (User A), debating trust in local government. At the time, Ternullo's display name was "Stevie Tsr," so User A's replies begin with an @-mention reading "Stevie Tsr" addressed to him — not her own name. Transcript — Stephen G Ternullo: "So what government tells us is the truth?" User A: "[Stevie Tsr] 'the government?' These are your neighbors, but it's much easier to blame the boogeyman than actually have a plan." Stephen G Ternullo: "[User A] ya ok" User A: "[Stevie Tsr] excellent counter point... This is Stoneham. The Illuminati aren't running the town, they are your neighbors, you know them, you see them at Stop and Shop, you see them eating dinners with their families. Why do you show your neighbors so much contempt?"

Facebook comment thread (about 2 years before the screenshot) in which a redacted commenter (User A) grills Stephen Ternullo Sr. over unanswered questions and past behavior during a Select Board election, joined by a second redacted commenter (User B). Transcript — User A: "[Stephen Ternullo Sr.] I have a few questions for you regarding your statement. First, I cannot agree more about our police department and their response. It was incredible. I also am disgusted by the superintendent and his basic cover-up. My questions directed to you are specific to the highlighted portion of your statement. You're claiming that you will bring transparency. Last year when you ran for the same position, when I asked you pointed questions that you didn't like, after childish comments by you, you completely deleted the post. How have you changed in the past year to show that you can bring transparency? How have you changed in the past year that you will not blow up and throw a temper tantrum when asked questions that you don't like? An additional question I have for you is regarding honesty and integrity. After your childish behavior a year ago, you stated that you were withdrawing from the race. A claim that turned out to be a disingenuous statement. How can voters believe you have integrity and are trustworthy if that was your reaction just one year ago? The town of stoneham wants honest, transparent leaders who have integrity. My personal experience with you has shown me that you do not possess those qualities. Can you please address my concerns for me and for the many others who have contacted me directly about your statement?" User A: "[Stephen Ternullo Sr.] Are you planning on answering the questions that I asked and tagged you in a couple of days ago before the election happens?" User B: "[User A] Any answer? Very frustrating seeing election is tomorrow- could sway votes one way or another" User A: "[User B] no. Which sadly is an answer itself. Guess Stephen Ternullo Sr. hasn't changed" User A: "[Everyone] second election in a row that Stephen Ternullo Sr. refuses to answer direct questions while running for SB. Remember this tomorrow. If this is how he responds DURING an election, how many crickets would there be if he was to be elected?"

Facebook comment thread (from about three years before the screenshot) in which three redacted commenters discuss Stephen Ternullo deleting his own posts and comments, and say they won't vote for him. Transcript — User A (redacted): "He's deleting posts. Posted about his great day speaking with Stoneham residents, answering questions etc but when asked questions he deletes reposts. Weird." User B (redacted): "Yes, I saw that someone had asked him why he was deleting messages, a few moments later it was edited where that comment questioning him why he was deleting messages itself deleted... Apparently he hates all questions, despite that fact that he was bragging and congratulating himself about how good he was at answering everyone questions... 😂😂😂" User C (redacted): "I drive by that house regularly. I would never vote for him, and I've voted for Republicans before. I don't vote for individuals who have nothing but hate in their hearts. He wouldn't represent me or my views."

Facebook post by Stoneham Firefighters Local 2116 (Mar 28, 2025), a letter to residents about the proposed Proposition 2½ tax override. Text: "Dear residents, Stoneham Firefighters Local 2116 will not be taking an official stance on the proposed Proposition 2½ tax override. The members of Local 2116 understand that this vote is a personal decision that each taxpayer will have to make. However, we feel it is important that voters be presented with the following facts about the Stoneham Fire Department's current status. We remain committed to serving the residents of Stoneham and ensuring the highest level of emergency response and safety for our community. As always, we appreciate your support and consideration as you make your decision on the upcoming vote. Please review our letter to the residents of Stoneham."

Attached image, "A Message from Stoneham Firefighters Local 2116 to the Residents of Stoneham": "The members of Local 2116 feel it is important that voters be presented with the following facts about the Stoneham Fire Department's current status, as well as how passage of the override would affect the Department:

Call Volume: Stoneham Fire responded to 2,465 calls in 2012 with an average staffing of 7 firefighters on duty each day. In 2024, we responded to 4,344 calls with an average staffing of 8 firefighters on duty each day. This is a 76% increase in call volume (1,879 calls) over the past 12 years, with only 1 additional firefighter on duty each day. Over the past 8 years alone, our call volume has increased by 40% while average shift staffing has only increased from 7 to 8 firefighters. With over 600 new apartment and condo units being developed at locations including Weiss Farm, the old hospital site, and One Montvale Ave, our call volume is expected to continue rising, putting further strain on emergency response services.

Current Staffing: NFPA standards dictate that 17 firefighters should respond to a single-family house fire within 8 minutes. With our average daily staffing of 8 firefighters, this means we need 9 firefighters from 3 other towns to respond to a house fire in Stoneham within 8 minutes. NFPA standards dictate that 28 firefighters should respond to an apartment house fire within 8 minutes. With our average daily staffing of 8 firefighters, this means we need 20 firefighters from 5-7 other towns to respond to an apartment fire in Stoneham within 8 minutes. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) publishes standards for fire safety and emergency response that are recognized as industry standards. The Insurance Services Office (ISO) has a rating system that determines how well fire departments can protect the community they serve. This rating factors into home insurance rates within the community and is based in part on a fire department's adherence to NFPA standards.

Changes to the Department, should an override be approved: Restore the Deputy Chief position that was cut in 2004 ($160,000). Promote 4 firefighters to Lieutenant, ensuring that each unit has an officer assigned ($62,568). Hire 4 additional firefighters to increase daily staffing by 1 position ($240,000).

Current Average Shift Staffing (8) vs. Proposed Minimum Shift Staffing (9): Current — Engine 4: Captain, Firefighter, Firefighter; Engine 1: Lieutenant, Firefighter, Firefighter; Ladder 1: Firefighter, Firefighter. Proposed — Engine 4: Captain, Firefighter, Firefighter; Engine 1: Lieutenant, Firefighter, Firefighter; Ladder 1: Lieutenant (Promotion), Firefighter, Firefighter (New Position)."

No comments are visible in the image, and no redactions appear.

Facebook "People who reacted" screen for a post (68 total reactions: mostly Likes, several "haha" laughing reactions, one "care" and one "love"), documenting that Stephen G Ternullo reacted with the laughing "haha" emoji. His entry, with his beach-photo avatar, is visible unredacted: "Stephen G Ternullo 😆". Several other people in the list who also left "haha" or "like" reactions have their avatars and names covered by red marker strokes.

Facebook post in the Stoneham Community Group (Feb 28, 2025) by a redacted user (User A), questioning town spending on a fire truck. Text: "In case I haven't started enough conversation today, I wonder why we are paying about 5,000. per month to house a fire truck we don't use on private property." Below is a reply from Stephen G Ternullo (1y): "But there is no mismanagement, what a joke." accompanied by a blue graphic reading "KEEP STONEHAM AFFORDABLE FOR ALL — STONEHAM — April 1st — Vote NO — TAX OVERRIDE."

Facebook comment thread (about 1 year before the screenshot) in which Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor") argues with a redacted commenter (User A) about a town budget override vote. At the time, Ternullo's display name was "Stevie Tsr," so each of User A's replies begins with an @-mention reading "Stevie Tsr" addressed to him — not her own name. Transcript — Stephen G Ternullo: "[User A, redacted] it appears to me that our elected and appointed boards are not telling the voters the complete truth. In light of this information the voters need to table this override with no vote and force these boards to make the necessary cuts to down size our town government and maybe revisit this in a year." User A: "[Stevie Tsr] that is absolutely terrible advice. There is no 'tabling' of the override, there is voting YES or NO. The override isn't up for discussion - it is ON the ballot already for April. Voting YES will fund our town departments so that drastic cuts and reductions won't need to be made. Voting NO means that DPW staff will be reduced, budgets for SFD and SPD will be reduced, the School District will be decimated, and every town department will be forced to make cuts in services, manpower or both." Stephen G Ternullo: "[User A] stop with the scare tactics it's getting old. Hopefully the votes see through your incompetence on the FAB." User A: "[Stevie Tsr] I'm sharing facts, as presented by the Department Heads and Town Employees, at official town board meetings and info sessions. If you and your PAC have plans and information to share that will help in funding our town's needs in the face of this crisis I recommend you share them. I haven't attacked you personally in any of my comments or questions, but you seem to prefer to do that rather than answer the question I keep bringing up to you and your PAC. Hopefully the voters see that and realize what is really needed to move our town forward."

Facebook post in the Stoneham Community Group (Feb 3, 2023) by a redacted user (User A), sharing a news story about a Stoneham police officer. Text: "Is this town for real?? I'm watching TV last night and this comes on. What is wrong with the police officers around here when it comes to money? What will we see next??? Dine and dashes by PD at the 99?" followed by a link to an NBC Boston article titled "High-Ranking Stoneham, MA Cop Stiffs Landlords, Racks Up Unpaid Debts." Attached is a photo of a man in a baseball cap and dark jacket standing beside an open door of a black police-style SUV, holding a drink, on a residential street. Below is the linked article preview from nbcboston.com, headlined "Deadbeat on the Beat: High-Ranking Cop Stiffs Landlords, Racks Up Unpaid Debts." No other commenters appear in the image.

Single long Facebook comment by Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor"), then a 2023 Select Board candidate, responding to a question about a police-related controversy. Text: "[User A, redacted] Good morning [User A]. Thank you for allowing me to answer your question. As you know, our campaign platform is in support of a strong police department. Let me define a strong, effective community police department. The Stoneham residents should feel and be safe on our streets and in their homes. When people travel through our town they will abide by our town and state laws. They need to realize that SPD will find and arrest you if you commit a crime in our town. You will receive a written citation if you speed through our town. These are just some of our campaigns' definitions of a strong SPD. As a Select Board member, I will work with SPD to help in any way I can to make their job more effective, efficient and provide the tools and resources they need to keep our residents safe. Public safety is one of our campaigns' top priorities. The Stoneham Police officers that I know are some of the best police that I have seen in my lifetime. As far as this particular case, I feel it would be irresponsible for me to comment since I just don't know all the facts. I will say this that I do find this very concerning and troubling. I will reserve my right to comment until I do know all the facts of this situation. Again, thank you for allowing me to answer your question. I look forward to speaking to all our residents during our campaign to be your next Select Board member. I will be your voice. Stephen Ternullo candidate for Stoneham Select Board 2023." No other commenters appear in the image.

Long Facebook comment thread (about 2 years before the screenshot) in which Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor") argues about town spending, an override, and public-safety staffing with three separate redacted commenters (User A, User B, User C). At the time, Ternullo's display name was "Stevie Tsr," so each commenter's replies begin with an @-mention reading "Stevie Tsr" addressed to him — not their own names. Transcript —

Stephen G Ternullo: "The town is overspending and town government is too big and needs to be cut."

User A: "[Stevie Tsr] adjusted for inflation and wage growth, Stoneham's budget is 70% of what it was a decade ago. But if being able to cover multiple major house fires, supporting languages in schools, and having a police department that in the same proportion as neighboring towns is 'overspending', they I guess you have a very different definition than most."

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User A] apparently you like a big government and wasteful spending."

User B (redacted, different color, identifies herself as a finance board member): "[Stevie Tsr] How would you like to see the town government reduced?"

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User B] as you know bad decisions from our town leaders have been made before, lucky enough the voters squashed the 2.9 million dollar Arnold House purchase. That is just one example of poor a decision."

User B: "[Stevie Tsr] I totally agree with you about the Arnold house. As a member of the finance board, we unanimously voted against it. But I go back to my question to you and that is how would you like the town government reduced? People wise? Or money wise?"

User C (redacted, different color): "[Stevie Tsr] great question! Would love to hear an answer. Maybe we let the fire department struggle more?"

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User C] please tell me your first hand knowledge of how the FD is struggling?"

User C: "[Stevie Tsr] only what I heard from the fire chief at the select board meeting with was pretty scary stuff"

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User C] right only what you heard."

User C: "[Stevie Tsr] heard from the person managing the issues and experiencing it first hand and laying out the dire circumstances we're in"

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User C] do you ever hear the horror stories of the property owners struggling to pay their bills and can't afford another $200 per month increase in their property taxes"

User C: "[Stevie Tsr] I sure do! I also hear about exemptions for those who cannot afford an override, for seniors, for those with disabilities, and for vets. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I don't like paying car insurance I think it's a waste of money, but when someone hits me I'll be thankful. I cannot afford a tax increase, but if god forbid a fire or emergency happens (only God knows when something could happen) it'll be nice to know our public safety teams are adequately able to help"

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User C] https://govsalaries.com/salaries/MA/town-of-stoneham" — with a link preview from govsalaries.com, "Town of Stoneham Salaries."

User C: "[Stevie Tsr] 'Average annual salary was $48,201 and median salary was $45,571.' (For Stoneham from your link above) 'As of January 2025, the average annual salary for a town employee in Massachusetts is $130,275' (from ZipRecruiter) So yes they make 3% more than the US average but we live in the most expensive state. They make almost 90k less than the average town employee salary in our state. Anything under 50k is not a livable wage in MA. Which is a totally different conversation. But you just proved the point that they are vastly underpaid compared to others in our state"

Stephen G Ternullo: "[User C] what I posted was the 2023 salaries"

User C: "[Stevie Tsr] 'The average town employee salary in Massachusetts in 2023 was $82,924' - ZipRecruiter, still double what stoneham was paid."

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jun 21, 2023), sharing his public statement to the Select Board about being excluded from the police chief hiring committee. Text: "Good morning, last night at the Select Board meeting I made a public statement expressing my disappointment and disbelief for not being selected to the committee to hire our next Police Chief. Please see below.

Good evening, Last week I was informed by our Town Administrator at my home that I would not be selected for one of the seats on the committee to hire our next Police Chief. In addition to this, no member of the Select Board (meaning any of you) selected me either. I was deeply disappointed by his decision primarily because I had recently run for office and received 42 percent of the vote as a newcomer to office. Further I am a United States Army Veteran serving our country in the Republic of Korea, one would think that my military experience would be an asset to the selection commitee. I would have thought that you the Select Board members would at least respect those efforts and encourage my interests in the importance of selecting our next police chief.

In addition to the Select Board actions I was told by Mr. Sheehan that the reason I was not selected as one of his two picks was because of my gender. I expressed my disbelief to him personally and this evening I am expressing my disbelief publicly to each of you and to our community. Nearly half of the people in this community voted for me and I believe I represent a significant number of Stonehamites.

This is a very important hiring for our town and we need all viewpoints heard on this committee. I bring the voice of those unrepresented citizens in our town. I ask you the members of the Select Board and the Town Administrator to reconsider your decision and add me as a special appointment to the committee to hire the Town of Stoneham's next police chief. Thank you." No comments or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (posted 2 minutes before the screenshot), announcing that Ternullo will not support the Stoneham Override Study Committee's recommendation. Full text: "As many of you know, I recently served as Vice Chair of the Stoneham Override Study Committee, a role I accepted to ensure that taxpayers' voices were heard and respected. During our meetings, I raised critical concerns about unfunded state mandates, the lack of financial transparency, and the need for greater efficiency in town departments. I pressed department heads with tough questions about how they could improve operations and reduce costs without relying on yet another tax increase. Unfortunately, most of those questions went unanswered, and not a single department head offered meaningful reforms beyond supporting the override. I was disappointed by the one-sided nature of these discussions and often felt like the lone voice urging the town to do better for its residents. After careful reflection, I cannot support the committee's recommendation for another override. With Stoneham families, seniors, and hardworking residents already struggling with higher rents, rising taxes, and mounting fees, another tax hike would be irresponsible and unfair—especially for seniors and young families who are already stretched thin. My priority is to keep Stoneham affordable, transparent, and inclusive for all. I remain committed to making sure residents are informed and that your voices guide this critical conversation. Thank you for trusting me to represent you. Regards, Stephen G Ternullo, Candidate for State Representative, 31st Middlesex District, Stoneham/Winchester, TernulloforRep.com"

Below the text is a shared campaign-website preview: a blue and red graphic reading "ELECT Stephen TERNULLO STATE REP — New Leadership — Stoneham & Winchester Deserve a Stronger Voice," linking to ternulloforrep.com, headlined "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" with preview text "I am honored to announce my candidacy for State R..." No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (Sep 18), sharing a press release. Headline: "Ternullo Calls for Accountability at Stoneham Override Study Committee Meeting." Full press release text: "Stephen Ternullo, Stoneham, MA. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, September 17th, 2025. Stoneham, MA — On Tuesday, September 16, 2025, Stephen Ternullo, candidate for State Representative in the 31st Middlesex District (Stoneham and Winchester), attended a meeting of Stoneham's Override Study Committee (OSC) to press state officials on legislative accountability. Ternullo urged full implementation of Massachusetts Ballot Question 1, approved by 72% of voters statewide and 73% in Stoneham in November 2024, which mandates an audit of the state legislature. A U.S. Army veteran and longtime Stoneham resident, Ternullo criticized local officials for obstructing the process and emphasized that the legislature should meet the same transparency standards as communities like Stoneham and Winchester, which undergo annual public audits. He cited findings from State Auditor Diana DiZoglio that uncovered millions in waste, fraud, and abuse, including Medicaid fraud and taxpayer funds directed toward migrant housing. While Rep. Michael Day remained silent on the matter, Sen. Jason Lewis dismissed the measure as 'unconstitutional,' despite its approval for the ballot by Democratic Attorney General Andrea Campbell. 'The people have spoken,' said Ternullo. 'If Beacon Hill politicians have nothing to hide, they should respect the voters' will and allow the audit to move forward.' The exchange highlighted the growing divide between voters' demand for transparency and the resistance of entrenched incumbents on Beacon Hill." No comments or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Nov 6, 2024), questioning the legitimacy of Joe Biden's 2020 popular-vote total and pointing to results on screen from a different election. Text: "There is no fin way Biden received 81 million votes in 2020. President Trump had a great night and look at these numbers for the popular vote." Attached photo: a TV screen showing 2024 presidential election results, headlined "PRESIDENT — 270 TO WIN," with photos of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump above electoral vote totals "226 Harris" and "292 Trump" (a yellow checkmark over Trump's total), and below that "POPULAR VOTE" showing "47.5% / 66,990,141" for Harris and "51.0% / 71,859,582" for Trump. No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jan 20, 2025), text-only. Text: "I really hope President Trump pardons the J6 political prisoners tonight." No comment text is shown, and no redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jan 25, 2025). Text: "Congratulations to newly confirmed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Now our military can do what they do best, kill the enemies of America." Attached is a graphic reading "PETE HEGSETH CONFIRMED!" over a photo of Pete Hegseth in military uniform saluting, with fighter jets and the White House in the background. No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jan 28, 2025). Text: "Boss lady right here." Embedded is a shared tweet from Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem, verified): "7 AM in NYC. Getting the dirt bags off the streets." with a photo of Noem wearing a police cap and a tactical vest marked "POLICE ICE," standing outside a brick building. No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post by Stephen G Ternullo, shared to the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group (Feb 5, 2025). Text: "Go get Stoneham's useless Superintendent US AG Bondi" followed by a shared graphic reading "BREAKING: AG Pam Bondi just ordered the Justice Department to freeze all funding for sanctuary cities and has instructed attorneys to begin prosecuting officials preventing ICE from doing their job. SO IT BEGINS. LET'S FREAKIN GO!" Below the text is a photo of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, blonde hair, in a dark pinstriped suit, seated at a microphone as if testifying. No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Aug 16, 2023). Text: "I wonder how many of our neighbors that display the 'hate has no home here' have offered a room in their home to these unvetted illegal immigrants." Attached is a shared link from howiecarrshow.com, with a photo of a woman speaking at a podium bearing the Massachusetts state seal, flanked by several other officials standing behind her, headlined "Where's the Red Carpet?" with preview text "It's been a week now since Democrats tried to g..." No comments are shown, and no redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Sep 30, 2023), text-only. Text: "Next time you see a Ukraine flag on a front porch instead of an American one, ask them why? My guess is they will look at you like you just asked them to explain quantum physics." No comments or redactions appear in the image.

Single Facebook comment by Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor"), about energy prices. Text: "Radical left governors in the northeast that won't allow a pipeline are the reason we are paying such high rates." No other commenters appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jul 25, 2023), text-only. Text: "I must admit watching RFK Jr (Democrat) on Hannity's townhall ripping the covid vaccine is good stuff." No comment text is shown, and no redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Sep 28, 2024). Text: "Getting ready for rally." Attached is a photo of the back of a Jeep parked on a residential street, mounted with a spare tire, flying an American flag and a "Trump" flag on either side of a sign reading "TRUMP VANCE — MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 2024." No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Dec 20, 2024). Text: "Our government schools are out of control. These are sick people." Attached is a shared article from mafamily.org, with a stock photo of a teacher holding up a rainbow pride flag in front of a classroom of elementary-age children seated at desks, headlined "Framingham Elementary School Hosting Sexuality Themed Club for K-5 Students - MFI |..." with preview text "Last spring we told you about Rainbow Clubs, th..." No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jun 15, 2023). Text: "This is from the Winchester conservatives page. Pic was taken in Woburn." Attached is a street photo of a flagpole flying a Progress Pride flag above another flag with a red field and a white sunburst, next to a tree, with a "STOP" sign, a Rte 30 street sign, houses, and a passing car visible below. Comment thread: Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "The generations living in our country right now have failed the past generations. Failed" A redacted commenter (User A): "[Stephen Ternullo Sr.] Can you imagine how future generations are going to look back at us. 'They let people who didn't even know if they were male or female dictate public policy'" Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "[User A] it's crazy"

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Apr 5, 2025). Text: "We must ensure that our new superintendent of schools signs certification against DEI policies and hold the School Committee accountable for complying with anti-discrimination laws and Title IX." Attached is a shared AP News link with a photo of Donald Trump raising his right hand (as if being sworn in) in front of an American flag, headlined "K-12 schools must sign certification against DEI to receive federal money, administration says" with preview text "As a condition for receiving federal money, the T..." No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Screenshot of a tweet retweeted by Stephen Ternullo Sr. Nick Adams (@NickAdamsinUSA, verified), Nov 24, 2022: "I say this with a heavy heart, but it's time to boycott the NHL. The left finally made Hockey woke, now it's time to make them go broke." Quoted below is a tweet from the NHL's official account (@NHL), replying to @BlueMountian12: "Trans women are women. Trans men are men. Nonbinary identity is real." (10:29 AM, 11/22/22, via Twitter for iPhone). No redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Jun 3, 2024). Text: "This is a legit poster from the United States Navy." Attached is a photo of a rainbow-striped poster credited to "Naval Special Warfare Command - Navy SEAL & SWCC Teams" (26,141 followers, posted 17h), featuring the Naval Special Warfare Command emblem and, in colored stripes, the words "NSW," "DIGNITY," "SERVICE," "RESPECT," "EQUALITY," and "PRIDE," with "NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE" at the bottom. No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook post in the Stoneham Community Group (Nov 16, 2025) by a redacted user (User A), announcing a town event. Text: "This Tuesday there will be a Property Tax Exemption Luncheon at the Senior Center at 10:30 am. The Assessors Office will come for an educational session about the various property tax exemption opportunities. There will also be a free lunch. RSVP by calling the Senior Center. ** Please note this event is sponsored by and put on by the Board of Assessors**" Attached is a flyer with a blue and teal abstract design reading "You're invited to attend our upcoming PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION INFORMATION LUNCHEON. Join the Assessors Office this Tuesday November 18th at the Stoneham Senior Center at 10:30am for an educational session discussing property tax exemptions. There will be free lunch and information on tax exemptions. Please RSVP by calling 781-438-1157." No other commenters appear in the image.

Facebook comment thread in which Stephen G Ternullo questions who is paying for a free lunch at a Stoneham senior-centre event and three other commenters push back on him; the names and avatars of everyone but Ternullo are covered by coloured marker strokes. Transcript — User A (yellow): "[Stephen G Ternullo] the event Tuesday allows for questions and also a free lunch!" Stephen G Ternullo: "[User A] who is paying for this free lunch?" User B (green): "[Stephen G Ternullo] wow. You found the budget problem. Amazing. Never mind worry about our fire department, our schools or our seniors. You want to make sure no free lunch for the very people you claim to be concerned about. OK...... perhaps you can next find out who covers the toilet paper in town hall" User A: "[Stephen G Ternullo] I believe a volunteer from the senior center had offered to pay for the lunches" User C (blue): "I heard you were generously offering to pay bc you were so concerned for the seniors in our town! Thank you so much!" User A: "[User C] [Stephen G Ternullo] I know that you aren't involved with KSA anymore because of your own campaign but I feel like this is actually a genius campaign idea for KSA."

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Aug 3, 2024), criticizing a community Facebook page's admin for moderation choices. Text: "Any conversation about President Trump the admin of the community page deletes all posts. I realize some of you may be personal friends with the admin but she allowed the all out bashing of one of our neighbors opinion non stop. The admin of the community page is a disgrace to our democracy."

Comment thread: User A (redacted): "Who is she to silence people it's unconstitutional" Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "[User A] did the person that left an unsecured room unlocked and allowed theft of Stoneham taxpayers equipment get fired?" User B (redacted, different color): "What happened in the neighborhood alerts yesterday? I missed the post but the response was so rude" Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "[User B] let me get this straight, I personally do not like the guy but he has a right to post what he wants as do I and you. The fin mentally ill including the admin allowed the relentless bashing and allowed the post to stay up. Remember their voice dominates because they stay loud, well we can stay louder. I have Trump/Vance signs reach out" — accompanied by a photo of a yard sign reading "TRUMP VANCE — MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 2024" on grass.

Facebook post in the "Stoneham Republican Town Committee and Supporters" group by Stephen G Ternullo (Aug 3, 2024), complaining that his posts on the Stoneham Community Group now require admin approval. Text: "So now anything I post on the Stoneham community page has to be approved." Attached is a phone screenshot of the Facebook post-composer screen for "Stoneham Community Group," under the account name "Steve T Senior," showing options ("Private group," "Add groups," "AI label off") and the placeholder text "Submit a post for admin approval..." with the standard photo/video, camera, background color, check in, live video, tag people, and GIF options below.

Comment thread: a redacted commenter (User A): "Communist. Why not start a petition. Write to the Editor. Selectmen. Don't let it rest." Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "[User A] the post started when someone asked why isn't there voter ID. Then the left in town started to attack the right. That's when I jumped in. After a few post the thread got deleted by the admin. Then I posted a video from RSBN of President Trump then she censored me." Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "The biggest commie in town. I remember when she took a knee on the Town Common for a criminal that abused police"

Single Facebook comment by Stephen G Ternullo (marked "Author"), calling someone a "clown." Text: "[User A, redacted] this clown can't mind his own business." No other commenters appear in the image.

Facebook comment thread (about 1 year before the screenshot) in which Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor") argues with a redacted commenter (User A) about school budget cuts made 25 years earlier. Transcript — Stephen G Ternullo: "Please refresh my memory what happened 25 years ago? Both my children were in the Stoneham schools and in sports that I coached. Nothing happened!" User A: "To refresh your memory, we were on accreditation warning for failure of the community to support the schools system, we had to lay off many teachers, we had to institute a sports fee, we lost our arts program, and that's just on the school side. I'm sure you can find the records or videos if you look." Stephen G Ternullo: "Layoffs happen daily in the private sector—it's unfortunate, but it's a reality. Our town government is inefficient, and taxpayer money isn't being used effectively. The budget cuts made 25 years ago appear to have had little to no effect on education, as most students still graduated and are now successful adults." User A: "Stevie, you are wrong, but happily live with what ever reality you've fabricated for yourself so you can sleep at night. Best of luck to you."

Facebook comment thread (about 1 year before the screenshot) in which Stephen G Ternullo (marked "All-star contributor") argues with a redacted commenter (User A) about school funding and taxes, with a second redacted commenter (User B) chiming in. At the time, Ternullo's display name was "Stevie Tsr," so both commenters' replies begin with an @-mention reading "Stevie Tsr" addressed to him — not their own names. Transcript — Stephen G Ternullo: "That's a first, so raising the property owners real estate taxes up over 22% will teach morality to other peoples children? Wow ok" User A: "[Stevie Tsr] that's exactly what she said. Because she believes in the value of community, that people are generally good and will support and care for each other, and that we should do all we can to enable that." Stephen G Ternullo: "[User A] right, so pay more taxes and boom children will behave. WTF is wrong with you" User B (redacted, different color): "[Stevie Tsr] bleak series of responses. You just have to laugh" User A: "[Stevie Tsr] I know you don't like data and facts, but for all the other readers here - that's exactly what I'm saying, and here's the research. In summary, and plenty more research supporting - 'Students who attended better-funded schools were 15% less likely to be arrested through age 30.'" followed by a link to a University of Michigan article, "Public school investment reduces adult crime, study shows" (record.umich.edu).

Facebook post in the Stoneham Community Group by Stephen G Ternullo (Mar 31, 2025), sharing a "Keep Stoneham Affordable for All" post with a data table comparing school spending. Ternullo's text: "Stoneham spends more per student than any neighboring school district in our area but achieves poorer results." Shared post from "Keep Stoneham Affordable for All" (Mar 28, 2025): "If Stoneham already has the best student-to-teacher ratio in the area and spends the most per student, yet still has high numbers of students not meeting expectations, then the issue isn't a lack of funding—it's how the money is being managed. Instead of demanding more from taxpayers, town officials should focus on accountability, better resource allocation, and ensuring that existing funds are used effectively to improve educational outcomes."

Attached spreadsheet screenshot, "Next Generation MCAS Results — % Not Meeting (NM) Expectations," comparing Student Teacher Ratio, Cost Per Student, and percent not meeting expectations in English Language Arts, Math, and Science across five towns: Stoneham (10.8 ratio, $20,072.37/student, 13% ELA, 11% Math, 9% Science), Wakefield (11.7, $20,057.96, 12%, 9%, 12%), Winchester (12.2, $18,002.28, 5%, 4%, 3%), Melrose (13.7, $15,247.73, 1%, 8%, 9%), and Mystic Valley Regional Charter (16.3, $15,031.22, 4%, 3%, 6%).

Comment thread: a redacted commenter (User A) pushes back: "This feels familiar - In science and statistics we call this cherry-picking your data. Convenient you stopped at three towns as a charter school that can pick their own students. Here's the fuller context and citations - https://profiles.doe.mass.edu/statereport/teacherdata.aspx https://profiles.doe.mass.edu/statereport/ppx.aspx" followed by a wider table of Ratio and Cost per student for ten towns: Medford (10.3, $22,857.00), Wilmington (10.5, $24,379.00), Stoneham (10.8, $20,910.00), North Reading (11.2, $20,852.00), Woburn (11.5, $23,319.00), Wakefield (11.7, $20,657.00), Winchester (12.6, $19,024.00), Reading (12.9, $19,058.00), Melrose (13.7, $16,293.00), and Saugus (14.3, $18,564.00).

Facebook post in the Stoneham Community Group by Stephen G Ternullo (Dec 7, 2025), titled "Let's Cut Central Administration — Put the Money Back Into Classrooms!" arguing that school district administrative salaries should be cut before raising taxes, and urging a "No" vote on ballot questions 1 & 2. Full text: "Stoneham taxpayers are being told we 'don't fund our schools,' yet millions are tied up in central office salaries and layers of administration not teachers, not students, not classrooms. And this is their contract that ended July 1st. Before approving new spending or asking residents for higher taxes, shouldn't we review and reform this first? Instead of piling on permanent tax increases, let's trim bloated administrative budgets and redirect those dollars to where they actually matter: Teachers, Direct student support, Special education, Classroom resources. Our priorities should be students not stacked office titles. Let's fix the spending problem before reaching into residents' pockets. Vote NO on 1 & 2 — demand accountability, efficiency, and real classroom investment!" Below the text is an attached image of three salary tables (with an asterisked note "These roles do not evaluate people" on positions marked ***):

District Wide Administrative Staff — Payroll and Benefits Coord***: $68,562; Network Administrator***: $104,458; Asst. Superintendent of Schools: $155,922; District Secretary***: $76,649; Superintendent of Schools: $199,000; Budget Director***: $144,462; Student Data Manager***: $81,790; Director of Media and Digital Learning: $120,967; Media Tech***: $64,570; HR: $128,307; Student Data Assistant***: $59,928. Subtotal: $1,204,615.

Building Based Administration — Vice Principal HS: $131,735; Vice Principal MS: $117,361; Principal CP: $137,349; Principal HS: $151,370; PreSchool Director: $120,820; Humanities Supervisor 5-8: $105,740; STEM Supervisor 5-8: $124,919; Humanities Supervisor 9-12: $108,598; STEM Supervisor 9-12: $110,581; Athletics & Phys. Ed.: $129,635; Principal SO - interim: $134,000; Principal MS: $144,690; Principal RH: $137,563; Asst. Principal: $110,524; Asst. Principal: $113,424; Assist Principal - interim: $100,873. Subtotal: $1,979,182.

Special Education Administration — Confidential Secretary - Special Ed***: $68,833; Secretary - SPED: $57,184; Sped Director: $145,000; SPED Coordinator***: $100,858; SPED Coordinator***: $100,858; SPED Coordinator***: $101,288; SPED Coordinator***: $101,289; SPED Coordinator***: $97,920. Subtotal: $773,230.

No other commenters or redactions appear in the image.

Facebook comment thread (about 8 months before the screenshot) responding to Stephen G Ternullo's post about cutting school administrative positions, in which one redacted commenter (User A) repeatedly argues with him and two other redacted commenters (User B, User C) each push back once. Transcript — User A: "I'm also for cutting some middle management but your list is ridiculous you have to have a person doing payroll. You need a principal and a super independent. It's a ridiculous/unserious list. My vote is yes. And when you run my vote is for Michael Day. A man who has actual serious suggestion's. How do you think people get paid without pay roll. How do you apply and bring in grants without some of these positions. You clearly have no idea what goes into running a large business." Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "[User A] what is ridiculous? This came directly from the superintendent" User A: "[Stephen G Ternullo] you can cut some leadership you can't cut all. Your not trying to find a solution your trying to find a justification for your No Vote. Thats not leading." User A: "[Stephen G Ternullo] your pushing against our fire department. The coalition for seniors the public library the schools the department of public works and many more. A no vote is a slap in the face to all of those departments and every citizen that uses them." Stephen G Ternullo (Author): "[User A] I have tremendous respect for our firefighters, police, teachers, and public workers. Asking voters to demand transparency and responsible budgeting is not a slap in anyone's face. Many rank-and-file workers in these departments have privately voiced concerns too. I welcome any discussion you're always welcome to reach out." User B (redacted, different color): "[Stephen G Ternullo] do you officially disagree with the endorsement of our own firefighters union?" User C (redacted, different color): "[Stephen G Ternullo] how is this not transparent? You literally can look up what everything costs (as you did). Which of these positions will you actually propose eliminating? I have never heard of a school operating without a principal. What savings will that generate against the shortage? What are the actual numbers for your proposal?" User A: "[Stephen G Ternullo] I think they need your vote to fund their jobs more than your respect."

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (August 28 at 6:50PM), with an AI-detection browser extension's "Deep Analysis report" overlaid on top of it. Post text: "Truly humbled by the support. I spent Friday hand-delivering lawn signs to residents in Stoneham and Winchester who reached out and asked for one. There is something incredibly humbling about a resident being willing to put my name on their property and publicly show their support for this campaign. I don't take a single one of these signs — or the trust behind them — for granted. But the best part of this campaign continues to be the conversations. Meeting people at their homes, listening to their concerns, hearing what matters to their families, and talking about what we can do differently for Stoneham and Winchester. Every conversation reminds me why I decided to run in the first place. Thank you to everyone who has opened their door, shared their thoughts, displayed a sign, volunteered, or offered words of encouragement. I'm grateful for your support, humbled by your trust, and ready to keep working to earn every vote. Your Money. Your Right to Know." The overlaid "Deep Analysis report" reads: Human score 6%, with a breakdown of "Human written" 0, "Mixed" 0, and "AI Generated phrasing" 11; AI score 94%; Structure 3% (flagged "Critical").

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (Sep 2 at 7:46AM), with an AI-detection browser extension's "Deep Analysis report" overlaid on top of it. Post text: "Yesterday's primary was an important milestone for our campaign, but today I'm thinking mostly about how grateful I am. Thank you to everyone who voted, volunteered, held a sign, put a sign in their yard, shared a post, or simply stopped to talk with me along the way. Your support means the world to me. I also want to thank everyone who participated in the primary, regardless of who you supported. We won't always agree on every issue, but I believe public service starts with listening to everyone and respecting different points of view. As we move toward November, my commitment remains the same: to continue meeting people throughout Stoneham and Winchester, listening to their concerns, and having honest conversations about our shared future. We have a lot of work ahead of us between now and November 3rd. If you'd like to host a lawn sign, join us on the doors, volunteer, or simply share what's on your mind, please reach out anytime. I'm grateful for how far we've come and ready for the work ahead. Thank you, Stoneham and Winchester. On to November!" The overlaid "Deep Analysis report" reads: Human score 5%, with a breakdown of "Human written" 0, "Mixed" 0, and "AI Generated phrasing" 11; AI score 95%; Structure 3% (flagged "Critical").

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (Sep 2 at 5:03PM), with an AI-detection browser extension's "Deep Analysis report" overlaid on top of it. Post text: "The primary is behind us — and now it's full steam ahead to November 3rd! After a long day at the polls in both Stoneham and Winchester, followed by celebrating Mike Minogue's primary victory, we were right back at it today — delivering and setting up campaign signs requested by residents across the district. Every sign going up represents something bigger than a campaign. It represents a resident willing to stand with us and show their support. I'm incredibly grateful for every one of them. This campaign is about working hard, showing up, listening to people, and earning every single vote — Republican, Democrat, or unenrolled. Stoneham and Winchester deserve a strong, independent voice on Beacon Hill — and we're just getting started. Thank you to everyone who has welcomed a sign onto their property, volunteered, or supported this campaign. On to November 3rd. Full steam ahead!" The overlaid "Deep Analysis report" reads: Human score 7%, with a breakdown of "Human written" 0, "Mixed" 0, and "AI Generated phrasing" 11; AI score 93%; Structure 3% (flagged "Critical").

Facebook post from Stephen G Ternullo's campaign page, tagged as being "with John Deaton for US Senate and..." (June 6, Winchester), with the "GPTZero" AI-detection browser extension's "Basic Scan" overlaid below it. Post text: "A Fantastic Day at Winchester Town Day! I am incredibly humbled by the overwhelming wave of support we received from Winchester residents today. From the moment we set up, the energy was electric! While talking with voters across the community, the same crucial messages kept coming up: affordability, state-level accountability and audits, and skyrocketing energy costs. These aren't just talking points — they are the core of why I am running to represent Winchester and Stoneham. Families deserve a transparent government that keeps life here affordable. A special, heartfelt thank you goes out to my wife, Katie, and my campaign co-manager, Jerry. You both work tirelessly behind the scenes to keep this operation moving forward, and I couldn't do any of this without your unwavering love and support. A huge thank you also to U.S. Senate candidate John Deaton for stopping by our booth today and standing with us! To our countless volunteers: you are the absolute engine of this campaign, and we couldn't do this without your tireless hard work. Thank you also to the event organizers for putting together a flawless day. To every Winchester and Stoneham resident who stopped by to talk, share their story, or offer words of encouragement — thank you. We are building real momentum, and together, we're going to bring accountability back to the State House this November!" Attached is a photo from the event showing people at an outdoor booth with campaign signage reading "Nov 3" and "Stephen..." visible. The GPTZero "Basic Scan" overlay reads "We are highly confident this text was AI generated," breaking the text down as AI 100%, Mixed 0%, Human 0%.

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (June 14), with the "Pangram 4.0" AI-detection browser extension overlaid on top of it. Post text: "Happy Birthday, United States Army. For 251 years, American Soldiers have answered the call to serve, defend freedom, and protect our nation. They have stood watch in times of war and peace, sacrificing comfort, time with family, and, for far too many, their lives in service to something greater than themselves. As an Army veteran, I know that wearing the uniform is more than a job — it is a commitment to duty, honor, and country. The Army teaches that leadership means putting others before yourself, accepting responsibility, and never backing down from a challenge. Those values did not end when I took off the uniform. They continue to guide me today as I seek to serve the people of Stoneham and Winchester as your next State Representative. Today, we honor every Soldier who has served, every family who has sacrificed, and every hero who never came home. Happy 251st Birthday to the United States Army. May we never forget the courage, strength, and selfless service of those who have defended this great nation. Army Strong. Stephen Ternullo, U.S. Army Veteran, For State Representative, 31st Middlesex District (Stoneham & Winchester)." Attached is a graphic reading "HAPPY BIRTHDAY" over a military photo. The Pangram overlay reads "AI Generated," 175 words scanned · "Short text," with the verdict "We believe that this entire text is AI" and a gauge showing 100% "of this text is AI."

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (July 4), with the "Pangram 4.0" AI-detection browser extension overlaid on top of it. Post text: "Happy 250th Independence Day! Today, America celebrates an extraordinary milestone — 250 years of freedom, courage, and opportunity. Two and a half centuries ago, brave men and women dared to build a nation founded on the timeless truth that our rights come from God — not from government. Their courage gave birth to the greatest experiment in self-government the world has ever known. As an Army veteran, I understand that our freedom has never been free. Generations of Americans have answered the call to defend our flag and the principles it represents. Their sacrifice reminds us that liberty is a responsibility entrusted to every generation. As a husband, father, Papa, and candidate for State Representative, I know exactly what we're fighting to protect: our families, our faith, our communities, and the promise that our children and grandchildren will inherit an America that is stronger, freer, and more prosperous than the one we enjoy today. This Independence Day, let's celebrate not only our nation's past, but its future. Let's renew our commitment to the values that have always made America exceptional — faith, family, freedom, personal responsibility, and love of country. From my family to yours, I wish you a safe, joyful, and blessed Fourth of July. Happy 250th Birthday, America! God bless our community, God bless our troops and veterans, and God bless the United States of America." Attached is a graphic reading "INDEPENDENCE DAY" / "HAPPY 250th BIRTHDAY" over a fireworks display and an American flag. The Pangram overlay reads "AI Generated," 230 words scanned, with the verdict "We believe that this entire text is AI" and a gauge showing 100% "of this text is AI."

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (July 20), titled "Where I Stand on Food, Farming & Your Tax Dollars," with an AI-detection browser extension overlaid on part of the text (the same red-robot-icon tool branded "Pangram 4.0" in later screenshots of this series). Post text: "Friends, This week I completed a legislative candidate survey on Massachusetts' food system, agriculture, and nutrition. While we may not agree on every policy proposed by the organization conducting the survey, I welcomed the opportunity to share where I stand. I believe we need common-sense food policies that support local farmers, promote healthier communities, and respect taxpayers. For nearly four decades, I've worked with my hands as a Pipefitter and refrigeration technician. I know the value of hard work, personal responsibility, and supporting local businesses. Those same values shape my approach to agriculture and food policy. A few years ago, I made a commitment to improve my own health. Through intermittent fasting, regular exercise, and choosing high-quality, locally raised foods whenever possible, I transformed my lifestyle. It wasn't a government program that changed my health — it was education, discipline, and better choices. That's why I believe government should empower people with information and opportunity, not dictate how they live. As your State Representative, I will fight to: Protect Massachusetts family farms and reduce unnecessary regulations that make it harder to stay in business. Preserve farmland so future generations can continue farming in the Commonwealth. Strengthen our local food supply and reduce our dependence on distant supply chains. Support nutrition education so families have the knowledge to make informed choices. Demand accountability for every taxpayer dollar spent on food and agriculture programs." The overlay shows an "All Segments" panel with one segment tagged "AI · High" (306 words) titled "Where I Stand on Food, Farming & You...", and a gauge reading "AI" with the caption "We believe the segment is AI-generated."

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (July 10), with the "Pangram 4.0" AI-detection browser extension overlaid on top of it. Post text: "Leadership is about results, not political promises. This week, Michael Day celebrated the passage of H.5562, the Economic Development Bill, and made it appear as though Stoneham and Winchester received millions of dollars in new funding. The facts matter. A bond authorization is not a check in hand. It is approval for the state to borrow money in the future. While these projects may have potential, communities cannot rely on announcements and promises — they need results they can count on. Our residents are dealing with real challenges today: rising taxes, higher energy costs, and the increasing cost of living. For 38 years, I have worked as a refrigeration technician. In my profession, you don't get credit for saying you'll fix a problem — you show up, roll up your sleeves, and get the job done. Since joining Pipefitters Local 537 in 2001, I have continued that commitment to skilled trades and hard work. That is the same approach I will bring to Beacon Hill. As your State Representative, I will fight for transparency, responsible spending, lower costs, and making sure Stoneham and Winchester receive the support they can actually depend on. People deserve more than headlines. They deserve accountability and results. Your Money. Your Right to Know." The Pangram overlay reads "AI Generated," 209 words scanned, with the verdict "We believe that this entire text is AI" and a gauge showing 100% "of this text is AI."

Facebook post from the "Stephen G Ternullo for State Representative" campaign page (July 2), with the "Pangram 4.0" AI-detection browser extension overlaid on top of it. Post text: "Why are property taxes going up? Representative Michael Day's vote for the $63.4 billion state budget shows just how disconnected Beacon Hill has become from the financial reality facing families in Stoneham and Winchester. The budget increases state spending by 4%, relies on one-time revenues, and fails to provide the kind of predictable local aid our communities need. The consequences are already here. On July 1, Stoneham homeowners opened their mailboxes to higher property tax bills after the $9.3 million override took effect. Winchester now faces a projected $5 million structural deficit and many residents are understandably concerned that they could face the same situation. When local leaders asked Representative Day for long-term fiscal solutions, the response was more temporary earmarks instead of meaningful reform. I'm running for State Representative because working families deserve someone who understands what these tax bills mean. For 38 years, I've gone to work every day as a refrigeration technician and proud member of Pipefitters Local 537. I know what it's like to earn a paycheck, balance a household budget, and worry about rising costs. I will fight to reform Massachusetts' outdated local aid formulas so communities like Stoneham and Winchester can properly fund schools, public safety, and essential services without repeatedly turning to property tax overrides. I'll also fight to ensure the voter-approved audit of the Legislature is finally carried out so taxpayers know exactly how their money is being spent and where waste can be eliminated." Attached is a partially visible image of a Massachusetts legislative roll-call vote sheet ("Yea and Nay," a numbered list of representatives' names and votes). The Pangram overlay reads "AI Generated," 253 words scanned, with the verdict "We believe that this entire text is AI" and a gauge showing 100% "of this text is AI."

Facebook post from Stephen G Ternullo's campaign page (June 12), with the "GPTZero" AI-detection browser extension's "Advanced Scan" overlaid below it. Post text: "Wednesday, the Massachusetts House passed a $228 million supplemental budget (H. 5493) on a 154-2 vote. Our current State Representative, Michael Day, voted 'Yes.' Beacon Hill crammed this bill full of massive policy changes, hoping taxpayers wouldn't notice the fine print. Look at what they just rubber-stamped: Expanding the Shelter Crisis: Taxpayers were promised limits and accountability. Instead, this bill quietly extended maximum emergency shelter stays from 6 months to 9 months and officially locked 'Rapid Track' sites into permanent law. Hidden Healthcare Fees: They slapped a new 'assessment' on Pharmacy Benefit Managers. They can call it a fee or a regulatory charge all they want, but we know exactly how the economy works: new costs on the supply chain get passed right down to local families, employers, and patients. Redirecting Failed Subsidies: When green energy companies didn't even apply for $35 million in state tax incentives over the last two years, did Beacon Hill give that money back to you? No. They voted to dump it into a trust fund to spend it anyway. More Blank Checks: They tacked on another $22.5 million in taxpayer funding for free inmate phone calls — propping up a program with costs that continue to balloon. Only TWO representatives out of 156 had the backbone to stand up and vote 'No' to this back-room package. When I talk to neighbors in Winchester and Stoneham, nobody is asking for higher fees, more structural spending, or less accountability. Families are stretching every single dollar just to get by right now. They deserve a representative who actually reads the fine print and protects their wallets. I'm running for State Representative to end the autopilot spending on Beacon Hill and bring genuine financial accountability back to the 31st Middlesex District. If you are ready for a representative who puts your household budget first, join our campaign." Attached is an image of a Massachusetts House of Representatives roll-call vote record for "H. 5493 On passing to be engrossed" (154 yeas, 2 nays, 06/10/2026), overlaid with a watermark reading "MASS FISC[AL]...". The GPTZero "Advanced Scan" overlay reads "We are highly confident this text was AI generated," breaking the text down as AI 100%, Mixed 0%, Human 0%, and lists several individual sentences it flagged as having the highest AI impact (e.g. "They can call it a fee or a regulatory charge all they want, but we know...", "Instead, this bill quietly extended maximum emergency shelter stays from...", "Expanding the Shelter Crisis: Taxpayers were promised limits and...") with a note "Read 12 more" below.

Screenshot of a Winchester News article opening with the italicized line "The following was submitted by the Committee to Elect Stephen Ternullo:", with the "GPTZero" AI-detection browser extension's "Basic Scan" overlaid on the lower portion. Article text: "Civic leader, veteran, and family advocate Stephen Ternullo is running for Massachusetts state representative for the 31st Middlesex District, representing the towns of Winchester and Stoneham. Running against incumbent Michael Day, Ternullo positions himself as a common-sense change agent determined to reverse the state's worsening economic trajectory and promote greater affordability for working families. Massachusetts faces an unprecedented affordability crisis, marked by skyrocketing living costs, crushing property taxes, and staggering utility rates. High taxes and regulations also have Massachusetts dead last in job creation. Ternullo argues that the high cost of living for residents and companies has triggered an outward migration of families, businesses, and critical jobs. 'We are trapped in an economic downward spiral, and we simply cannot keep doing the same things with the same politicians and expect better results,' said Ternullo. 'This isn't a partisan issue; it's a matter of common sense. Local families are suffering under the weight of an unmanageable cost of living, and complacency is no longer an option. Our community has the power to change this trajectory in November, and I am running to deliver the real, independent leadership we desperately need.' A central pillar of Ternullo's platform is a comprehensive reform of local aid distribution. He contends that state education funding for Winchester and Stoneham schools is structurally inadequate and requires an immediate overhaul of the Chapter 70 formula. By securing appropriate state allocations, Ternullo aims to alleviate the mounting pressure on local municipal budgets, further property tax increases, and ensure vital capital infra[structure]..." (text continues, cut off at the bottom of the screenshot). The GPTZero "Basic Scan" overlay reads "We are highly confident this text was AI generated."

Screenshot of a Winchester News article opening with the italicized line "The following was submitted by the Committee to Elect Stephen G. Ternullo:", with the "GPTZero" AI-detection browser extension's "Basic Scan" overlaid on the lower portion. Article text: "Republican candidate for state representative Stephen Ternullo criticized Rep. Michael Day for supporting the Legislature's $63.4 billion state budget, saying it continues Beacon Hill's pattern of increasing spending while failing to provide meaningful relief for local taxpayers. 'Representative Day's vote for this budget shows just how disconnected Beacon Hill has become from the financial reality facing families in Stoneham and Winchester,' said Ternullo. 'The budget increases state spending by 4%, relies on one-time revenues, and fails to provide the predictable local aid our communities need.' Ternullo pointed to the immediate impact on local taxpayers. On July 1, Stoneham homeowners received higher property tax bills following the implementation of the town's $9.3 million Proposition 2½ override. Meanwhile, Winchester is facing a projected $5 million structural deficit, leaving many residents concerned they could soon face similar tax increases." A highlighted disclaimer box in the middle of the article reads: "This information was submitted by the candidate or their campaign. The information provided and opinions expressed are those of the writer and do not represent the opinions of Winchester News which aims to be impartial in its own reporting." The remainder of the article continues below, partially obscured by the overlay ("When local officials have asked Beacon Hill for long-term solutions, they've..."). The GPTZero "Basic Scan" overlay reads "We are highly confident this text was AI generated," breaking the text down as AI 100%, Mixed 0%, Human 0%.

Screenshot of the Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) public filing portal for committee "19366 Ternullo, Stephen," on the "Expenditures" tab, filtered by vendor name "Openai." The results table shows "Viewing 1 through 1 of 1 items, $21.25" with one row: Date 8/31/2026, Vendor "Openai *chatgpt su[bscription]", Purpose "Campaign Supplies," Amount $21.25, Source "Bank Report."

Screenshot of the Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) public filing portal for committee "19366 Ternullo, Stephen," on the "Expenditures" tab, filtered by vendor name "Associates." The results table shows "Viewing 1 through 4 of 4 items, $2,580.50," all paid to "Tuesday Associates": 12/1/2025, Purpose "Consultant Fee," Amount $500.00, Source "Bank Report"; 11/21/2025, Purpose "Printing for Kickoff Party," Amount $1,280.50, Source "Bank Report"; 11/5/2025, Purpose "November/Terrullo Consultant Fee," Amount $500.00, Source "Bank Report"; 10/21/2025, Purpose "Pay for October Consultant Fee," Amount $300.00, Source "Bank Report."

Screenshot of the "Tuesday Associates" political consulting firm's website, its "General Consulting" service page. Text: "We use our more than two decades of strategic expertise to motivate voters to go to the polls. Tuesday Associates has produced literally hundreds of campaign plans. We build winning strategies and timelines that put campaigns on the road to victory. Our detailed plans contain all the necessary information to organize effectively. Moreover, we work with your team on implementation." Below is a bulleted list, "Our general consulting services cover these areas: Strategic planning, Message development, Earned media programs, Social media strategy, Timeline development, Crisis management, Budgeting."

Screenshot of a Wikipedia excerpt about Holly Robichaud. Text: "Holly Robichaud is founder of Tuesday Associates, a Massachusetts-based political consulting firm specializing in campaign strategy, earned media, direct mail, voter contact programs and fundraising. She is also a reporter, blogger and radio personality for the Boston Herald, often using the moniker 'The Lone Republican'. In 2011, Robichaud was named to Aristotle's Excellence Awards' 'National Republican Dream Team' for her work in direct mail," with citation-number superscripts after several clauses.